Pages

Monday, June 29, 2026

Rarities - Unproduced Alternate Head 1983 Zap

One of the great laments among collectors is that the heads from the original 13 Joes were too repetitive and did not match the look of the characters from the comic.  In the Marvel series, each character had some distinctive look that allowed the reader to differentiate the characters when they appeared on the printed page.  But, the actual action figures reused parts and Hawk, Short Fuse, Steeler and Flash used the same head, Breaker, Rock and Roll and Clutch used the same head and Zap, Grunt and Grand Slam also used the same head.  Hasbro did their best to differentiate the characters by using different paint colors on the hair.  But, in the end, the figures had a sameness that simply was inferior to their comic book appearance.

It seems, though, that Hasbro had a plan to rectify this in 1983.  Originally, Hasbro planned to release a few of the swivel arm versions of the original 13 Joes with newly updated heads.  These would be unique to the figures and give the full line of 9 carded Joes all with distinct heads.  The heads got so far into the process of design that full production loose figures and even carded samples exist.  For some reason, though, Hasbro abandoned the idea.  And, the swivel arm figures kept the heads from their straight arm debut.  

Zap was one of the figures who was intended to get a new head.  Instead of the experienced Grunt head, he got a younger look that was given a Zorro mustache to give Zap real panache.  You can see the head in the photos below.

As a modern collector who was introduced to the concept of alternate heads as an adult, I don't find them all that interesting.  I think the alternate head loses something for the character.  But, a big part of that is that I'm conditioned to think of the original 13 as parts-sharing cohesion.  And, my only exposure to the alternate head is online photos.  They look weird to me because I had spent over 30 years "knowing" what a Zap figure looked like.  Once you get past that bias, you can see that the heads have merit.  While this Zap head isn't perfect.  It's an  upgrade over the repainted, grumpy old man head that he shared with Grunt and Grand Slam.  

The reality is, as a kid, the new head would have been enough for me to want the figure again.  I'd have noticed the difference and annoyingly explained to my mom that the figures were different and I needed another Zap.  So, the ploy would have worked.  (And, we had very few swivel arm versions of original 13 characters.)  I'm not sure if it would have scaled to masses of other kids.  But, the sheer volume of Joe toys sold really make you wonder why these heads weren't used.  

Hasbro spent all the money to develop them and get them to full production status.  These aren't hand painted samples.  So, all the expense had been absorbed by the line.  And, some 1983 figures were still in production as late as 1985.  Hasbro could easily have sold them in high enough volume to recoup the costs.  Imagine the "Original Adventure Team" mail away.  I ignored it as it was figures I already had.  But, think about it with a marketing caption of "All new heads!".  I'd have saved up my money and sent away for it.  Just think if the Palitoy, Takara or, even Funskool versions of these figures had featured the alternate heads.  Hasbro had plenty of opportunity to recoup the costs.  Maybe the logistics were just too much to match up the new heads with the pre-existing bodies.  But, it seems that these heads not seeing full production runs was a matter of choice rather than opportunity.

_____Update_____

Some good info on one of the comments that indicates these were planned for a 1984 release.  The card forts (specifically on the swivel arm battle grip logo) indicate the cards were 1984's.  Which, really raises the possibility that, had these been released, it would have been a shorter 1984 run and swivel arm figures would exist with both heads.  That does, though, cement the fact that, had these been released, they'd command a premium over the original head.


1983 Zap with Alternate, Unproduced Head

1983 Zap with Alternate, Unproduced Head






















Since this figure's original discovery, many more have surfaced.  There are loose and carded versions out there.  Like most rarities, once one of them is finally revealed, many others come out of the woodwork.  It's like people keep  them hidden to prevent anyone from knowing about the item.  But, once it gets out, everyone pulls theirs out of hiding so they can get the street cred of owing the rare piece.  It's dumb.  But, that's how the Joe world has always worked.

Seeing items like this makes me think of how the Joe world would have changed had these been released.  For many of the earliest years, collectors often considered straight arms and swivel arms of the original 13 interchangeable.  Had these heads been used, that would not have been the case.  Would it have made the original heads or the new heads the more desirable piece?  I suspect the new heads would have made many of the swivel arm figures more desirable for kids.  Which would have translated to greater collector interest as they became adults.

Since many of the original 13 swivel arm figures are already expensive, I don't know if having new heads would have driven the prices higher.  It would have, though, lead to thousands of ancient message board posts from someone who had a "rare variant" of a swivel Zap with the straight arm head.  Those would have been insufferable.  But, the heads would have been a net positive for the line.  It's a shame they didn't happen and no one's gotten the full story as to why they were abandoned when they were so close to production.

1983 Zap with Alternate, Unproduced Head


10 comments:

  1. I like this head so much better than Zap's original ugly mug. I only like the head for Grunt because it reminds me of Michael Ironside.

    It'd be awesome to get some official version of this from Hasbro, but that's a pipe dream. It's insane to me how badly they fumbled the original re-release in 1997, and even now, they're barely capable of giving us a few remolded figures at a time, as the recent releases are pretty flawed (Duke's goofy face, Cobra Soldier bent lower legs, etc). But in some other timeline, Hasbro could have easily released a set of the original 13, with the unproduced heads.

    When I first saw the unproduced head, I wondered if it was a hoax. The main reason I don't think it can be, is that nobody could produce that head sculpt today. It's just too good, and too perfect a match for the early 80's Joes. That style just can't be counterfeited. And damn that is one good looking figure. The different shades of green go so hard together, even after 40 years. If they've faded or yellowed, I can't tell, and maybe it makes them look even better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In terms of specimens that are "publicly" known and photo-documented, In aware of Zap, Breaker, and Short-Fuze. Am I missing any others that have been credibly documented?

    Setting aside the four O13 drivers for a second, (I'm not sure if they would have gotten the new head treatment as well), I also wonder if at least one character with a "shared" head would have retained the original. For example, Zap gets a new head, but Grunt keeps the original; Short-Fuze gets a new head, but Flash keeps the original, etc Given how much development was put into the specimens we know of, I'd assume that all of the carded "shared head" Joes would have gotten updates. But, who knows at this point ..

    It also makes me wonder if they had update plans for Stalker, Snake Eyes, and Scarlett. That would have been cool (especially for Scarlett...woof!).

    Finally, there's always the inevitable conjecture that "The head that got used on ___ production figure might have actually started out as the replacement head for one of the O13 Joes". Again, no way of verifying any of that until credible photographic evidence appears. But, knowing how things rarely go to waste in the toy industry, I've got to assume that SOME of these heads got folded into later-released characters (assuming the development phases all preceded the implementation of the revised ball-socket heads in 1985).

    So many unknowns...but that's part of what makes this one so intriguing to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's just those three that are known. Had they come to pass, then all 9 carded figures would have had unique heads. I've never seen anything that would indicate the vehicle drivers were considered.

      It's weird as the '84 series very much has different types of heads. Duke, Thunder, Roadblock and Ripcord have heads that are very 1983. While the rest of the figures took a step forward. So, it's possible that more heads were sculpted and ended up getting reused. But, that seems to be speculation that this point. (People used to think that Doc's head was meant for Short Fuse. But, then, we saw the real Short Fuse head and that put that talk to bed.)

      Delete
  3. For some reason, that head looks more Japanese than Latin American. (And oddly enough, looks like a modified 1983 Airborne's.) Part of me is wondering if this was a cleverly-concocted custom, or, loathe as I am to assume, an AI creation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These were know about/documented long before AI became a problem.

      Delete
    2. My photos are from 2018. But, many people have seen the figures in person. (One was at JoeFest this past weekend.) And, many people own them. Pre production sculpts of them go back to at least 2013 or so. Well before AI slop.

      Delete
    3. No offense meant. It's an impressive find, never knew about these until today.

      Delete
  4. What a difference the alternate head makes for Zap and really does separate the figure from the rest of the OG13. It fits the card art/file card very well. At least Hasbro got it right with Sonic Fighter Zap.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Suddenly others appearing and people admit to having them is, yeah, typical of this hobby and AFAIK, GI JOE is the worst about this. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe there's Star Wars collectors who are secretive elitist weirdos. GI JOE is also the most fandom that has "I'm working on a book" types. Some of those books get made, some never do.

    On the other hand, people with rare items gets unsolicited offers from twits and that's one reason why they don't engage with fandom online. Those people are always out there. I was a kid lucky enough to get what I wanted most the time and learned you don't share that info with most other kids, nor bring anything to school.

    Still, what's the point of owning an undocumented rarity. The more time goes, by the less likely it'll be verified and if they croak without making arrangements, their heirs might be toss it in the trash or donate it to goodwill for all anyone knows.

    ReplyDelete
  6. One of the main reasons collectors keep quiet and never make it known on forms etcetera that they own such rare items is the instant cry of 'fake' and 'are you trying to con someone?' The Joe Forums are extremely toxic places - once someone is blacklisted, everyone else piles in on the victim like its still a school playground, but then they would, the pack mentality and the fact that adults are still playing with toys. So the owners keep quiet. I have known about these rare variants for years too and recall seeing photos back in 2018 somewhere I forget. It is a shame Hasbro did not put these into production - they should have done so in new uniform colours at least but it was clearly a cost cutting exercise - perhaps asking Ron Rudat about them would shed light on the subject. I also think Hasbro UK could have used the moulds in 1987 as part of their Action Force range when they took over the licence from Palitoy / Kenner Parker and released their toys - we were at least a good 4 years behind the US range maximum and minimum 2 years behind in terms of what we got - i.e. the Dragonfly was a 1983 toy, we got it in 1987, the Snowcat was a 1985 toy, we got it in 1987. Or the Persuader, a 1986 release and the UK / European markets got it in 1989 and so on and so forth. Perhaps Hasbro UK could have released these three as a Mail In offer? Or as they did in the 1990s with Spirit, Mutt and Lowlight, release them in exclusive new colours.

    ReplyDelete