Friday, August 2, 2019

2012 Retaliation Clutch - By Past Nastification

The two live action GI Joe movies haven’t scratched the itch Joe fans wanted. They’ve provided a mixed bag of figures, too.  Some good, some bad.  Clutch, from GI Joe:  Retalition, was released as the driver of the Tread Ripper.  The Tread Ripper itself is another conversation and probably not a good one.

The low articulation of Clutch is problematic.   

When GI Joe debuted in ARAH format in 1982, the figures had an astounding 12 points of articulation compared to Star Wars, whose standard figures had just 5 poa’s.  Some Star Wars figures had even fewer.  For Joe figures the number jumped up to 14 with the inclusion of the “swivel arm battle grip” in 1983. Certainly Mego never gets the credit it deserves for bringing the o-ring(ish) design into the mainstream by licensing/selling Micronauts, or streamlining the concept for its the Black Hole, Buck Rogers, or CHIPs lines.

So GI Joe is somewhat erroneously credited, or at least remembered, as being the innovator.  And, yes, there’s the fact that the 1:18 scale Micronaut figures were conceptual downscales in Japan based on the original American 12 inch Joes… which were arguably based on the Barbie concept.  There are several episodes of Toy Galaxy on youtube or The Toys that Made Us on Netflix to see how many layers there are to the action figure onion.  It gets complicated very fast, with lots of cross-pollination and borrowing from one company/toy line to another.

All of which is a long way of explaining that most Joe collectors can’t stand Joe figures with low articulation.  Taking away the high poa count is depriving them of their design identity.  I agree in theory, but in reality… somehow I don’t care.  Maybe my appreciation of the early low poa Palitoy Action Force figures bleeds over to this figure.  That said, for the 1:18 scale, the inclusion of hinged knees should be a given.  Even Kenner’s MASK figures had that in the mid 80’s, and they were 2 inch figures.   

As a kid, I would have hated, hated, hated this Clutch.  As a grownup, though, I’m fine with it and the limited 5 poa format.  At this point in my collecting, sculpt is more important to me than articulation.

Clutch is so beautifully sculpted that the lack of articulation just doesn’t bother me.  Of course, that’s me, and I guess that 95% of Joe collector’s hate this figure.  It’s a point I really can’t argue.  For the handful of us that are immune to the low poa count that flies against everything that GI Joe is from a design standpoint, it’s easy to see the nice work in this figure.

It’s not perfect, and that’s assuming you can live with a five poa figure.  The arms are marginally short, but mostly hidden by the bent elbows.   As far as this figure automatically registering as being Clutch, it doesn’t. It should have a black beard or grey stubble to really be Clutch.

But this is the movie universe Clutch, so it is what it is.  But the detailing on the head alone is astounding.  The crisp baseball cap, the beard, and the up-to-the-minute sunglasses are flawlessly sculpted.  Customizers may hate the rest of this figure, but they love this head.

The uniform looks realistic.  Clutch sports a ton of sculpted pouches and webgear, including a pistol and a knife (both of which should have been painted black like the sunglasses).  The sculpting on the pouches is impressive because it’s so lifelike.  The pouches aren’t in perfect rows; each pouch is slightly canted and crooked compared to its neighboring pouches.  This is a detail that could have been easily overdone, but it wasn’t.  The bent elbows and slightly bent knees give the figure a dynamic posture that old Star Wars figures never had.  Plus, the sculpted detail would have been broken up by adding more articulation points.

The figure’s construction is peculiar.  It appears to be put together like a standard 5 poa figure (but with a pop-off head).  The backpack and most of the webgear appear to be a snapped-in-place piece on a carved-out section of the torso.   Oddly, the Night Fox figure, also a low poa Retaliation driver, features a removable vest, but it’s uniquely keyed to the figure.  So why was Clutch designed in such a unique manner?  Who knows. 

The use of subdued colors is a welcomed change from obnoxious coloring.  Honestly, though, an unexpected and nonsensical color pop somewhere might have added to the design.  A lone orange pouch or a yellow grenade could have worked here.   

Maybe it’s just the sunglasses, but this Clutch has a badass quality that no previous Clutch figures have had.  The pistol might not be removable, but it has no less that 6 pouched magazines ready to go for it.  At the 1:18 scale, I prefer non-functioning holsters as they look more correctly sized. 

There were several other 5 poa figures in the Retaliation line.  This included the previously mentioned Night Fox, a Snake-Eyes, a Cobra Commander, and a Swamp Viper.  I was surprised by how much I liked the Clutch figure, so I’ll have to keep an eye out for the rest out and see if they also have outstanding sculpting.  I stumbled onto this Clutch figure recently and until I saw it in person I was lackluster about it.   

If the low poa count is a deal breaker for you, I completely understand and respect it.  But if you’re someone who can accept it, this is an impressive figure.  If you need a nudge, here’s an image of the head swapped out with a “real” Clutch head, from the 25A line.  If nothing else, just try to appreciate the sculpting on this odd duck from the Retaliation line.

I’m curious, am I alone in liking this figure?  Does anyone else like it or the other Retaliation drivers?

Would anyone really object if Hasbro would have made mostly pre-posed/low poa Cobra Soldiers in this format and packed them in as freebies with vehicles and playsets?  No.  Well, at least I wouldn’t! 




6 comments:

  1. Awful. looks like one of those figures packed in with an elite force vehicle, no amount of mental gymnastics can get past the point its closer to a knock off GI Joe then a real one.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I only own the 5 POA Hiss Driver Cobra Commander. Nice sculpting, but nearly useless. He cannot sit down all the way, only lean back, which works for his vehicle. They said it was cheaper to make an all new 5 POA than just sculpt a new head and plop it on existing tooling. They really said that. IIRC, "They" meaning Deryl DePriest, whom a bunch of Star Wars nerds just gave a bunch of money to so he can make a pretty pretty picture book in the age of digital media.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked these guys, especially the Swamp Viper. I always had it my mind that I'd support a budget Action Force line of 5 poa figures for dollar stores and such. So that I could get the figures and characters without angering purists. 5 poa troop builders would be the bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Past NastificationAugust 4, 2019 at 7:36 PM

    I've also picked up Night Fox, which I also like. Keeping my eye out for the others, but only at a cheap price. I'd be good with more of these if the detailing was there.

    While agree with P-W that it is closer to a knock-off than a real Joe, what distinguishes it is the highly detailed sculpting. Just curious- would you like this figure if Hasbro had added just a bit more articulation, like knees and wrists?

    I had read the bit about it being cheaper somewhere before, too. I don't know anything about manufacturing, so I don't know what to think. But it feels a bit off, doesn't it? They already had the existing molds...

    ReplyDelete
  5. For the G.I. Joe: Retaliation Movie line at the time it came out(2012-2013), they did cut back on articulation on some figures, at least in the 1st 2 Waves, as the claim was due to budget/cost reasons, and I guess since they felt they were going to try and target kids again, they needed some of the figures to handle a bit of rough play by kids.

    As well, I have to assume that because Rise Of Cobra's Movie line bombed badly(Which they were really hoping would draw kids in, similar to the 2007 Transformers Movie Line), even though the Pursuit Of Cobra and 30th Anniversary lines were well received by collectors and fans and they had no problems putting a bit of money into those lines, Hasbro probably had a bit of cold feet when the Retaliation line was in production, just incase it bombed as well. Course another reason could of been the fact that the movie producers hired the Rock as Roadblock, so who knows how much money was needed for him, and if that played a role in any toy budgeting.

    For the Single Figures, really only Ninja Characters had the Standard Pursuit Of Cobra/30th Anniversary Articulation(Which was a bit more or updated than the 25th Anniversary and probably some of the Rise Of Cobra Movie figures). Any other Single Figures, and they had a bit less, as I'd say it was a bit closer to some of the tail end of the Valour V.S. Venom/Beginning of the Direct To Consumer line style articulation, as these less POA figures had ball-jointed elbows and knees instead of double jointed, no ankle joints, maybe more basic wrists or no wrist articulation, and maybe a few having no waist joint at all.

    I will say that for the 1st 2 Wave Single Card Figures with less Joints, I was a bit more understanding, since I felt many of the designs on those figures were still neat(Regardless if they were accurate or not to the Retaliation Movie), and to me, they were still well moveable. Maybe not as articulated as a 25th Anniversary figure, but still well enough I felt. Though I think my mind sometimes still kept thinking that certain joints were suppose to be there when they weren't from time to time.

    The Drivers were 5 POA, while it appeared that the Motocycle Drivers had 7 POA since they include Knees, as it was a similar tactic to the 4" Marvel Movie Figures at the time as well. At the very least, these 5 POA and 7 POA figures had Ball Jointed Heads, so you could swap out the heads on these less articulated figures, and pop them on other Joe figures with more POA to them, as I recalled either or both JoeBattleLines and General Joes websites showing that off in some of their reviews at the time. I will admit that this made the sting of the drives as 5-7 POA's a bit more okay to me, as I'd say that it even encourage me to consider some figures from the Retaliation line that I didn't think about before.

    As for the 5-7 POA Drivers themselves(Including this Clutch, which I own, but haven't opened the toy yet), I would say many of them are very well sculpted and detailed, as I do like their designs. Having said that, I do wish that Hasbro at least gave them the same amount of articulation as the less POA Single Figures. I mean, the 1st Wave Duke/2nd Wave Flint body in this line would of been a good enough body for this Clutch head as well as the Retaliation Night Fox(Just not as detailed as their 5 POA bodies). Or even, just use some older sculped bodies with new heads. But using a more articulated figure would mean more count parts in the factories, so I think that's the reason why they did the drivers as 5-7 POA.

    I agree with Past Nastification, that for the Cobra side, maybe for many of those vehicles, they could of used more 5-7 POA Cobra Trooper style characters instead of Name Characters, if only to help army build a bit more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before I continue, I had to do this part of my comment as a 2nd posting, if only because when I tried to post it all, it gave me a "Comment Too Long To Post"...

      In the end, it appeared that Hasbro had listened to fans(Once again of course), and for the last waves or 2 of the Single Figures, they had back the standard Pursuit Of Cobra/30th Anniversary articulation. It also appeared that some of what was suppose to be the final wave of small vehicles that got cancelled(But then later used for the Toys R Us Exclusive G.I. Joe 50th Anniversary line's Vehicle Boxsets) were also going to have back standard articulation. At the very least, the Eaglehawk/Tomahawk's driver, Lift-Ticket, did have the standard articulation.

      At the time, I was wondering why they cut back articulation, even more so on the Drivers. At 1 point on a toy messageboard, when they were asking users to post a question that they may choose to ask the G.I. Joe Hasbro Team, I basically stated how back in the Joe V.S. Cobra line around 2001 or 2002, how those figures had less joints, and then back tracked and added in articulation due to fans(Basically, at 1st, not being O-ring figures, then adding in the O-Ring back), as I had wondered why they didn't want to learn from the Line's history, in that having less joints does affect the line in general. Needless to say, my question wasn't chosen, but it still baffles me that the design team has access to all this info, history, and market research(Which includes various toy reviews from various websites by this time) to see that it might not be a good idea to do 5 POA figures for G.I. Joe.

      On a side note, it also appeared at that time frame for some of Hasbro's other 4" figures(Star Wars and Marvel), that they were also looking at doing less articulated figures as well for their Single Carded and Multipack figures. For Star Wars, this would eventually lead to the return of 5 POA figures in those lines. Having said that, I will say for Star Wars, that many of them were very nicely sculpted figures. Sadly, I couldn't say the same for most 5 POA Marvel figures for the most part.

      Delete